Earth Hour

The following is an excerpt from an actual email (slightly altered to protect the identity of my employer) I received this afternoon:

"Please be advised that Beutsche Dank will be participating in the World Wildlife Fund's annual Earth Hour event this Saturday, March 28. Facility staff will begin switching off all nonessential lighting... at approximately 4:00PM.

Beutsche Dank’s participation in Earth Hour will contribute to increasing our collective understanding and awareness of the Beutsche Dank Sustainability Program. [Yes, that's the one where you don't use the milk for cereal.] The event will also support the Dank’s global goal to achieve carbon neutrality by 2012."

Earth Hour? This struck me as a spectacularly idiotic idea, so I visited the website http://www.earthhour.org/ to find out more. There, I learned that it was even sillier than I first imagined:

"For the first time in history, people of all ages, nationalities, race and background have the opportunity to use their light switch as their vote – Switching off your lights is a vote for Earth, or leaving them on is a vote for global warming. WWF are urging the world to VOTE EARTH and reach the target of 1 billion votes, which will be presented to world leaders at the Global Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen 2009."


(Watch the celebrities make a difference as they search for meaning in their empty lives; watch the brainwashed children regurgitate alarmist propaganda!)

Like a mosquito in a nudist colony, I thought: "Where do I begin?" But then, right as I was about to dive in with fork and knife, I received my daily Best of the Web email from James Taranto and, as luck would have it, he's organizing a last-minute counterprotest:

"Reader, if you are against global-warming hysteria, high taxes, socialized medicine and a weak foreign policy, Sunday is your day. Show how you feel about the issues by turning on your lights in the evening and leaving them on until you go to bed. If you go out for a drive after dark, make sure you turn your headlights on too.

Granted, the Earth Hour people have a head start on us. They started planning this months ago, whereas we're giving you all of 48 hours notice. Yet we think the outlook is bright for this effort. Tell your friends, tell them to tell their friends, and so on, and we'll bet millions of people across the country will turn their lights on Sunday night.

If no one will listen to the silent majority, let's at least make sure they see us."

Where do you stand? Vote with your light switch. And enjoy the weekend.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

"mosquito in a nudist colony" -> taken from Buffett's 2009 letter to shareholders.

scos said...

Thank you Anonymous. Buffett did in fact use that analogy in his 2008 letter to his Berkshire Hathaway shareholders. The exact quote is, "As we view GEICO’s current opportunities, Tony and I feel like two hungry mosquitoes in a nudist camp. Juicy targets are everywhere."

However, I first heard the line in a debate between Dinesh D'souza (Dartmouth '83) and Christopher Hitchens in October 2007. The subject: "Is Religion the Problem?"

Here's a link to the video: http://www.isi.org/lectures/flvplayer/lectureplayer.aspx?file=v000187_cicero_102207.flv

(At 8:43 you may recognize some familiar faces in an unexpected cameo.)

Rozenswag said...

While I agree that the idea of Earth Hour is a little smug (see South Park / hybrid episode) and feels a little We-Are-The-World-like, I applaud the efforts to reduce unnecessary consumption.

Below is an interesting NYTimes article about Freeman Dyson, one of the premier scientists who has played devil's advocate to what he describes as the 'religion' of protesting global warming.

http://tinyurl.com/ctoans

"'It’s always possible Hansen could turn out to be right,' he says of the climate scientist. 'If what he says were obviously wrong, he wouldn’t have achieved what he has. But Hansen has turned his science into ideology.'"

arod said...

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/10/us/politics/10morano.html?_r=1&ref=science

Interesting article on the guy behind the "huge" list of global warming skeptics

Bottom line is someone can cherry pick any data they want to prove his/her point but the credibility of data needs to be determined by the reader